Skip to content
Nephro Critical Care Society
  • Home
  • About
    • About Us
    • Our Journey
    • Vision, Mission & Objectives
    • Affiliations
  • Activities
    • Quiz OF The Week
    • Knowledge Sharing
    • Training Courses
    • Research
      • GLOBE RRT Survey
    • Literature
    • 5th Global Update In Nephro Critical Care POCUS IN NEPHRO CRITICAL CARE (PINC)
  • Blog
  • Media
    • Gallery
    • Videos
      • CRRT
      • AKI
      • Investigations & Biomarker
      • Fluid Therapy
      • Drug Dosing
      • Journal Scan
      • Other Extracorporeal Therapy
      • 5th Global Update In Nephro Critical Care POCUS IN NEPHRO CRITICAL CARE (PINC)
      • 5th Nephrocritical Care Review Course
  • Membership
    • Membership Benefits
    • All Members
    • Plus Members
  • My Account
    • Login
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • About
    • About Us
    • Our Journey
    • Vision, Mission & Objectives
    • Affiliations
  • Activities
    • Quiz OF The Week
    • Knowledge Sharing
    • Training Courses
    • Research
      • GLOBE RRT Survey
    • Literature
    • 5th Global Update In Nephro Critical Care POCUS IN NEPHRO CRITICAL CARE (PINC)
  • Blog
  • Media
    • Gallery
    • Videos
      • CRRT
      • AKI
      • Investigations & Biomarker
      • Fluid Therapy
      • Drug Dosing
      • Journal Scan
      • Other Extracorporeal Therapy
      • 5th Global Update In Nephro Critical Care POCUS IN NEPHRO CRITICAL CARE (PINC)
      • 5th Nephrocritical Care Review Course
  • Membership
    • Membership Benefits
    • All Members
    • Plus Members
  • My Account
    • Login
  • Contact Us

QW28-March 2025

Question 1: Select each option to validate with explanations

Clinical Case Scenanio

Jonathan Hayes, a 50-year-old kidney transplant recipient, presented with a gradual decline in graft function one-year post-transplant. His creatinine had risen from 1.72 mg/dL to 3.75 mg/dl with proteinuria, with a urea level of 90 mg/dL, despite unremarkable renal ultrasound findings. He remained on tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil, with a tacrolimus trough level of 6.4 ng/mL. Laboratory tests showed an elevated C-Reactive Protein of 28.7 mg/dL, but no obvious source of infection was identified on imaging or urinalysis, and CMV-PCR was negative. The abdominal CT-angiogram showed the following:

Question: What can be the cause of his worsening graft function?
😭

Wrong Answer: A. Renal artery thromboembolismA. Renal artery thromboembolism

😭

Wrong Answer: B. Renal vein thrombosis

😭

Wrong Answer: C. Tacrolimus toxicity

😉

Right Answer: D. Renal vein stenosis

Explaination:
In assessing declining renal function after renal transplant, factors to consider include renal vein stenosis, ureteral obstruction, transplant artery stenosis, acute rejection, and BK virus nephropathy. In this case, there was no evidence of rejection, infection, or external compression, and USG showed no abnormalities. The gradual decline in renal function suggested a possible acquired renal vein stenosis as shown in CT-Angiogram, likely due to chronic external pressure from the crossing iliac artery, leading to fibrosis and vessel narrowing The evaluation of these complications necessitates a comprehensive approach that includes imaging studies such as Doppler ultrasound and MR or CT angiography to identify vascular obstructions.



Renal vein stenosis is best treated with percutaneous stent angioplasty.
Renal artery thromboembolism and renal vein thrombosis (RVT) in a transplanted kidney, both are serious complications, characterised by sudden onset of flank pain, oliguria and sudden decline in renal functions. However, RVT may uniquely present with hematuria (blood in the urine) and swelling of the transplanted kidney.
Nephrotoxic tacrolimus doses cause gradual graft dysfunction, often accompanied by hypertension, hyperkalemia, and neurological symptoms like tremors, headaches, or seizures. Levels exceeding 15 ng/mL are considered toxic and necessitate dose adjustment.

Complications post renal transplantation



Reference:

1.Bakir N, Sluiter WJ, Ploeg RJ, van Son WJ, Tegzess AM. Primary renal graft thrombosis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1996; 11: 140–147.
2. Jordan ML, Cook GT, Cardella CJ. Ten years of experience with vascular complications in renal transplantation. J Urol 1982; 128: 689–692.
3. Osman Y, Shokeir A, Ali-el-Dein B et al. Vascular complications after live donor renal transplantation: Study of risk factors and effects on graft and patient survival. J Urol 2003; 169: 859–862.
4. Palleschi J, Novick AC, Braun WE, Magnusson MO. Vascular complication of renal transplantation. Urology 1980; 16: 61–67.
5. Rijksen JF, Koolen MI, Walaszewski JE, Terpstra JL, Vink M. Vas cular complications in 400 consecutive renal allotransplants. J Car diovasc Surg 1982; 23: 91–98.
6. Cercueil JP, Chevet D, Mousson C, Tatou E, Krause D, Rifle G. Acquired vein stenosis of renal allograft—Percutaneous treatment with self-expanding metallic stent. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1997; 12: 825–826. 7. Kim JK, Han DJ, Cho K-S. Post-infectious diffuse venous stenosis after renal transplantation: Duplex ultrasonography and CT angiog raphy. Eur Radiol 2002; 12: S118–S120.
7.Agarwal AK. Endovascular interventions for central vein stenosis. Kidney Res Clin Pract. 2015 Dec;34(4):228-32. doi: 10.1016/j.krcp.2015.10.005. Epub 2015 Nov 12. PMID: 26779426; PMCID: PMC4688584.
8.Mehmet Fatih Inci, Fuat Ozkan, Teik Choon See, Servet Tatli,Renal Transplant Complications: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Role of Radiology,Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal,Volume 65, Issue 3,2014
Nephro Critical Care Society

All rights reserved